Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law
-10%
portes grátis
Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law
Tuzet, Giovanni; Dahlman, Christian; Stein, Alex
Oxford University Press
09/2021
432
Dura
Inglês
9780198859307
15 a 20 dias
900
Descrição não disponível.
Evidence, truth and knowledge
1: Hock Lai Ho: Evidence and truth
2: Gabriel Broughton, Brian Leiter: The Naturalized epistemology approach to evidence
3: Jordi Ferrer Beltran: Proven facts, beliefs and reasoned verdicts
4: Lena Wahlberg, Christian Dahlman: The role of the expert witness
Law and factfinding
5: Frederick Schauer: The role of rules in the law of evidence
6: Jules Holroyd, Federico Picinali: Excluding evidence for integrity's sake
7: Alex Stein: Second-personal evidence
8: Mark Spottswood: Burdens of proof
9: Dale Nance: Weight of evidence
10: Talia Fisher: Cost-benefit analysis of fact-finding
Evidence, language and argumentation
11: Lawrence Solan: Linguistic evidentials and the law of hearsay
12: Giovanni Tuzet: The pragmatics of evidence discourse
13: Floris Bex: Argumentation and evidence
Evidence and explanation
14: Ronald Allen, Michael Pardo: Inference to the best explanation, relative plausibility and probability
15: Anne Ruth Mackor, Peter van Koppen: The scenario theory about evidence in criminal law
16: Amalia Amaya: Coherence in legal evidence
Evidence and probability
17: Franco Taroni, Alex Biedermann, Silvia Bozza: The logic of inference and decision for scientific evidence
18: Norman Fenton, David Lagnado: Bayesianism: objections and rebuttals
19: Christian Dahlman, Eivind Kolflaath: The problem of the prior in criminal trials
20: Michael Pardo, Ronald Allen: Generalizations and reference classes
Proof paradoxes
21: Mark Spottswood: Paradoxes of proof
22: Christian Dahlman, Amit Pundik: The problem of naked statistical evidence
Biases and epistemic injustice
23: Justin Sevier: Evidence law and empirical psychology
24: Julia Simon-Kerr: Relevance through a feminist lens
25: Jasmine Gonzales Rose: Race, evidence and epistemic injustice
26: Frank Zenker: De-biasing legal fact-finders
1: Hock Lai Ho: Evidence and truth
2: Gabriel Broughton, Brian Leiter: The Naturalized epistemology approach to evidence
3: Jordi Ferrer Beltran: Proven facts, beliefs and reasoned verdicts
4: Lena Wahlberg, Christian Dahlman: The role of the expert witness
Law and factfinding
5: Frederick Schauer: The role of rules in the law of evidence
6: Jules Holroyd, Federico Picinali: Excluding evidence for integrity's sake
7: Alex Stein: Second-personal evidence
8: Mark Spottswood: Burdens of proof
9: Dale Nance: Weight of evidence
10: Talia Fisher: Cost-benefit analysis of fact-finding
Evidence, language and argumentation
11: Lawrence Solan: Linguistic evidentials and the law of hearsay
12: Giovanni Tuzet: The pragmatics of evidence discourse
13: Floris Bex: Argumentation and evidence
Evidence and explanation
14: Ronald Allen, Michael Pardo: Inference to the best explanation, relative plausibility and probability
15: Anne Ruth Mackor, Peter van Koppen: The scenario theory about evidence in criminal law
16: Amalia Amaya: Coherence in legal evidence
Evidence and probability
17: Franco Taroni, Alex Biedermann, Silvia Bozza: The logic of inference and decision for scientific evidence
18: Norman Fenton, David Lagnado: Bayesianism: objections and rebuttals
19: Christian Dahlman, Eivind Kolflaath: The problem of the prior in criminal trials
20: Michael Pardo, Ronald Allen: Generalizations and reference classes
Proof paradoxes
21: Mark Spottswood: Paradoxes of proof
22: Christian Dahlman, Amit Pundik: The problem of naked statistical evidence
Biases and epistemic injustice
23: Justin Sevier: Evidence law and empirical psychology
24: Julia Simon-Kerr: Relevance through a feminist lens
25: Jasmine Gonzales Rose: Race, evidence and epistemic injustice
26: Frank Zenker: De-biasing legal fact-finders
Este título pertence ao(s) assunto(s) indicados(s). Para ver outros títulos clique no assunto desejado.
Evidence, truth and knowledge
1: Hock Lai Ho: Evidence and truth
2: Gabriel Broughton, Brian Leiter: The Naturalized epistemology approach to evidence
3: Jordi Ferrer Beltran: Proven facts, beliefs and reasoned verdicts
4: Lena Wahlberg, Christian Dahlman: The role of the expert witness
Law and factfinding
5: Frederick Schauer: The role of rules in the law of evidence
6: Jules Holroyd, Federico Picinali: Excluding evidence for integrity's sake
7: Alex Stein: Second-personal evidence
8: Mark Spottswood: Burdens of proof
9: Dale Nance: Weight of evidence
10: Talia Fisher: Cost-benefit analysis of fact-finding
Evidence, language and argumentation
11: Lawrence Solan: Linguistic evidentials and the law of hearsay
12: Giovanni Tuzet: The pragmatics of evidence discourse
13: Floris Bex: Argumentation and evidence
Evidence and explanation
14: Ronald Allen, Michael Pardo: Inference to the best explanation, relative plausibility and probability
15: Anne Ruth Mackor, Peter van Koppen: The scenario theory about evidence in criminal law
16: Amalia Amaya: Coherence in legal evidence
Evidence and probability
17: Franco Taroni, Alex Biedermann, Silvia Bozza: The logic of inference and decision for scientific evidence
18: Norman Fenton, David Lagnado: Bayesianism: objections and rebuttals
19: Christian Dahlman, Eivind Kolflaath: The problem of the prior in criminal trials
20: Michael Pardo, Ronald Allen: Generalizations and reference classes
Proof paradoxes
21: Mark Spottswood: Paradoxes of proof
22: Christian Dahlman, Amit Pundik: The problem of naked statistical evidence
Biases and epistemic injustice
23: Justin Sevier: Evidence law and empirical psychology
24: Julia Simon-Kerr: Relevance through a feminist lens
25: Jasmine Gonzales Rose: Race, evidence and epistemic injustice
26: Frank Zenker: De-biasing legal fact-finders
1: Hock Lai Ho: Evidence and truth
2: Gabriel Broughton, Brian Leiter: The Naturalized epistemology approach to evidence
3: Jordi Ferrer Beltran: Proven facts, beliefs and reasoned verdicts
4: Lena Wahlberg, Christian Dahlman: The role of the expert witness
Law and factfinding
5: Frederick Schauer: The role of rules in the law of evidence
6: Jules Holroyd, Federico Picinali: Excluding evidence for integrity's sake
7: Alex Stein: Second-personal evidence
8: Mark Spottswood: Burdens of proof
9: Dale Nance: Weight of evidence
10: Talia Fisher: Cost-benefit analysis of fact-finding
Evidence, language and argumentation
11: Lawrence Solan: Linguistic evidentials and the law of hearsay
12: Giovanni Tuzet: The pragmatics of evidence discourse
13: Floris Bex: Argumentation and evidence
Evidence and explanation
14: Ronald Allen, Michael Pardo: Inference to the best explanation, relative plausibility and probability
15: Anne Ruth Mackor, Peter van Koppen: The scenario theory about evidence in criminal law
16: Amalia Amaya: Coherence in legal evidence
Evidence and probability
17: Franco Taroni, Alex Biedermann, Silvia Bozza: The logic of inference and decision for scientific evidence
18: Norman Fenton, David Lagnado: Bayesianism: objections and rebuttals
19: Christian Dahlman, Eivind Kolflaath: The problem of the prior in criminal trials
20: Michael Pardo, Ronald Allen: Generalizations and reference classes
Proof paradoxes
21: Mark Spottswood: Paradoxes of proof
22: Christian Dahlman, Amit Pundik: The problem of naked statistical evidence
Biases and epistemic injustice
23: Justin Sevier: Evidence law and empirical psychology
24: Julia Simon-Kerr: Relevance through a feminist lens
25: Jasmine Gonzales Rose: Race, evidence and epistemic injustice
26: Frank Zenker: De-biasing legal fact-finders
Este título pertence ao(s) assunto(s) indicados(s). Para ver outros títulos clique no assunto desejado.
